|
|
Post by jarvisredwing on Feb 13, 2019 22:03:42 GMT -5
Anybody like the idea of giving 3 points for a regulation win. Makes it easier to catch a team above you if your team get hot later in the season. Also teams might take more chances late in a game if it's tied. Too many teams seem to look forward to the OT and make sure they get the single point.
Food for thought.
|
|
|
|
Post by number13 on Feb 22, 2019 13:10:54 GMT -5
Nah  I am not a fan of current system either. A loss is loss and you shouldn't get a reward for losing in OT or SO. Win = 2 points Loss = 0 points Ties = 1 point each team No shootouts. If tied after 5 minutes of the pond hockey shinny OT you tie and each team gets a point. The league will do the 3 point for a W thing before going back to older format or do away with a shootout which I personally cannot stand that a team sport being decided by a skills competition. I don't think the league wants to make it easier to make up ground...they like the parity. The other think I wouldn't like is the point totals would be funky. Tampa, currently the best team in the league through 62 games have 47 W's...that would be a 141 point total and they still have 20 games left if they won 1/2 of their remaining games and end up with 57 W's they'd end with 171 points  |
|
|
|
Post by PierreC on Feb 25, 2019 9:07:45 GMT -5
Anybody like the idea of giving 3 points for a regulation win. Makes it easier to catch a team above you if your team get hot later in the season. Also teams might take more chances late in a game if it's tied. Too many teams seem to look forward to the OT and make sure they get the single point.
Food for thought.
agree with that. All actions should be taken to motivate teams to play for the win... |
|
I am not a fan of current system either. A loss is loss and you shouldn't get a reward for losing in OT or SO.
